HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Renault Megane 3 Coupe vs Mercedes A-Class W169 vs Toyota Aygo 2

Variants
1.2 TCe 115
1.2 TCe 132 AT
1.2 TCe 132
1.4 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 110 CVT
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 90
1.5 dCi 95
1.6 110
1.6 dCi 130
1.6 dCi 130 Euro6
1.9 dCi 130
2.0 140 CVT
1.2 TCe 115
2.0 dCi 160
2.0 dCi 165
2.0 TCe 180
2.0 TCe 190
2.0 TCe 220
RS 265
RS 250
RS Trophy
RS Trophy-R
A 150
A 150 CVT
A 160 CDI
A 160 CDI CVT
A 170
A 170 CVT
A 180 CDI
A 180 CDI CVT
A 200
A 200 CDI
A 200 CDI CVT
A 200 CVT
A 200 Turbo
A 200 Turbo CVT
Pre-facelift Automatic
Pre-facelift Manual

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
435 L / 15.4 cu-ft ~ 1995 L / 70.5 cu-ft
168 L / 5.9 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
3.6 L / 3.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
2.8 L / 3.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
54.0 L / 14.3 gal
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
Passengers
5
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Torsion
Semi-independent

Construction

Body Style
3-door Coupe
5-door Hatchback
3-/5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1460 mm / 57.5 in
Size | Length
4299 mm / 169.3 in
3838 mm / 151.1 in
Size | Width
1764 mm / 69.4 in
1615 mm / 63.6 in
Track Width | Front
1430.0 mm / 56.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1420.0 mm / 55.9 in
Weight
860.0 kg / 1896.0 lbs
Wheel Size
14 in, 15 in
Wheelbase
2568 mm / 101.1 in
2340 mm / 92.1 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.34
Top Speed
160.0 km/h / 99.4 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
71.0 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Displacement
1.0 L / 60.9 cu-in / 998.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
84.0 mm / 3.3 in
Transmission | Gears
5-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
37%
1%
18%
Pros
  • Interesting Megane RS
  • Three-pointed star
  • Cute exterior design
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Very low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Awkward styling
  • Poor interiors
  • Poor engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • CVT
  • Exceptionally ugly
  • Great insult to the Mercedes name
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Very little cargo space

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.