Compare Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe vs Mercedes CLK C209 vs Mercedes CL C215 facelift
Variants
6AT
8AT
CLK 200 CGI
CLK 200 CGI AT
CLK 200 Kompressor
CLK 200 Kompressor AT
CLK 240
CLK 240 AT
CLK 270 CDI
CLK 270 CDI AT
CLK 320 AT
CLK 500 5AT
CLK 500 7AT
CLK 55 AMG
CL 55 AMG
CL 65 AMG
CL 500
CL 600
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
395 L / 13.9 cu-ft
435 L / 15.4 cu-ft
450 L / 15.9 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
14.0 L / 14.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
8.5 L / 9.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
100.0 L / 26.4 gal
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
88.0 L / 23.2 gal
Passengers
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
255/50 R21, 285/45 R21
Turning Circle
13.1 m / 43.0 ft
10.8 m / 35.3 ft
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Size | Height
1398 mm / 55.0 in
Size | Length
4638 mm / 182.6 in
4993 mm / 196.6 in
Size | Width
1987 mm / 78.2 in
Wheel Size
8J x 21, 9.5J x 21
Wheelbase
3320 mm / 130.7 in
2715 mm / 106.9 in
2885 mm / 113.6 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
5.8 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
5.5 sec
CO2 Emission
347 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.0:1
Engine | Displacement
6.7 L / 411.9 cu-in / 6749.0 cc
Engine | Power
460.0 hp / 343.0 kW @ 5350 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
68.2 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
84.6 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
720 Nm / 531.0 lb-ft @ 3500 rpm
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
99%
72%
98%
Pros
- Exceptional luxury
- Superbly smooth ride
- Wonderful retro design
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Decent styling
- Robust engine lineup
- Best-in-class styling
- Exceptional engine lineup
- Superb comfort
Cons
- Very expensive
- Large turning circle
- CLK 55 AMG is not supercharged
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- ABC problems
- Interior quality issues
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.