Compare Land Rover Freelander 2 vs Range Rover Velar L560 facelift vs BMW X6 G06
Variants
2.0 GTDi AWD AT
2.2 eD4
2.2 SD4 AWD AT
2.2 TD4 150 AWD
2.2 TD4 150 AWD AT
2.2 TD4 160
2.2 TD4 160 AT
3.2
D200
P250
P400e
D300
P340
P400
M50d
M50i
xDrive30d
xDrive30d MHEV
xDrive40d
xDrive40i
xDrive40i MHEV
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
755 L / 26.7 cu-ft ~ 1670 L / 59.0 cu-ft
580 L / 20.5 cu-ft ~ 1530 L / 54.0 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
735 kg / 1620 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
25.1 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
17.9 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
21.7 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/75 R16
Turning Circle
12.6 m / 41.3 ft
Water Fording
530 mm / 20.9 in
500 mm / 19.7 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
17.1 kWh (gross)
0.5 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
216 mm / 8.5 in
Size | Height
1740 mm / 68.5 in
1678 mm / 66.1 in
1696 mm / 66.8 in
Size | Length
4500 mm / 177.2 in
4797 mm / 188.9 in
4935 mm / 194.3 in
Size | Width
2147 mm / 84.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 2041 mm / 80.4 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1611.0 mm / 63.4 in
1640.0 mm / 64.6 in
1678.0 mm / 66.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1624.0 mm / 63.9 in
1657.0 mm / 65.2 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2660 mm / 104.7 in
2874 mm / 113.1 in
2975 mm / 117.1 in
Performance
Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
Offroad
500 mm Max Water Fording
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
8-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic Steptronic
Production
Availability
2020
Debut
2019-07-03
Made In
USA
Reviews
Neofiliac score
21%
67%
73%
Pros
- Decent drivetrain reliability (rare for an LR)
- Some interesting engine options
- More reliable than the bigger RRs
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Good performance
- Some offroad capabilities
- Interesting engine options
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Rather ugly
- Crossover nonsense
- Ugly hunchback styling
- Crossover nonsense
- Lack practicality
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.