Compare Land Rover Freelander 2 vs Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2 facelift
Variants
2.0 GTDi AWD AT
2.2 eD4
2.2 SD4 AWD AT
2.2 TD4 150 AWD
2.2 TD4 150 AWD AT
2.2 TD4 160
2.2 TD4 160 AT
3.2
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
1.4 TSI eHybrid DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 150
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 122 DSG
2.0 TDI 150 4MOTION DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 4MOTION DSG
2.0 TSI 190 4MOTION DSG
2.0 TSI 245 4MOTION DSG
Tiguan R
1.5 TSI 150 DSG R-Line
2.0 TDI 150 4MOTION DSG R-Line
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
755 L / 26.7 cu-ft ~ 1670 L / 59.0 cu-ft
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
735 kg / 1620 lbs
578 kg / 1274 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/75 R16
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
Turning Circle
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross) | 10.4 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
201 mm / 7.9 in
Size | Height
1740 mm / 68.5 in
1649 mm / 64.9 in
Size | Length
4500 mm / 177.2 in
4371 mm / 172.1 in
Track Width | Front
1611.0 mm / 63.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1624.0 mm / 63.9 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2660 mm / 104.7 in
2681 mm / 105.6 in
Performance
Electric Range
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
59.0 km / 36.7 mi
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
21%
27%
19%
Pros
- Decent drivetrain reliability (rare for an LR)
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Decent engines
- Down to very low 1.8L/100km fuel consumption
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Rather ugly
- Very ugly
- FWD-based
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Very ugly
- Only available with small engines
- Horrible suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.