Compare Hyundai Tucson 3 vs Mercedes GLC Coupe C253 facelift vs Mercedes GLC-Class X253
Variants
0.95 kWh Fuel Cell
1.6 CRDi 115
1.6 CRDi 136
1.6 CRDi 136 AWD
1.6 CRDi 136 AWD DCT
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
1.6 GDI 132 Euro6d
1.6 GDI 132
1.6 GDI 132 AT
1.6 T-GDI 177 Euro6d
1.6 T-GDI 177
1.6 T-GDI 177 AWD
1.6 T-GDI 177 AWD AT
1.6 T-GDI 177 Euro6d AWD
1.6 T-GDI 177 Euro6d AWD DCT
1.6 T-GDI 177 Euro6d DCT
1.7 CRDI 116
1.7 CRDI 141 DCT
2.0 CRDI 136
2.0 CRDI 136 AWD
2.0 CRDI 136 AWD AT
2.0 CRDi 185 AWD
2.0 CRDi 185 AWD AT
2.0 CRDi 185 AWD
2.0 CRDi 185 Euro6d AWD AT
2.0 GDI 164 AT
2.0 GDI 164 AWD AT
2.4 GDI 181 AT
2.4 GDI 181 AWD AT
AMG GLC 43
AMG GLC 63 S
AMG GLC 63
GLC 200
GLC 200d
GLC 220d
GLC 300
GLC 300d
GLC 300de
GLC 300e
GLC 400d
GLC 43 AMG 4MATIC AT
GLC 63 AMG 4MATIC+ MCT
GLC 63 AMG S 4MATIC+ MCT
F-CELL 4MATIC
GLC 220d 4MATIC AT
GLC 250 4MATIC AT
GLC 250d 4MATIC AT
GLC 300 4MATIC AT
GLC 350d 4MATIC AT
GLC 350e 4MATIC AT
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
19.9 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
12.1 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
16.5 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
0.9 kWh (gross)
13.5 kWh (gross)
13.5 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
123 mm / 4.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheelbase
2873 mm / 113.1 in
2873 mm / 113.1 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.35
0.33
Electric Range
45.0 km / 28.0 mi
51.0 km / 31.7 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
43%
63%
60%
Pros
- Improved exterior styling
- Good towing capacity
- Available with V8 AMG engines
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Great V8 in the 63AMG models
- Cleaner exterior styling
- Low official fuel consumption
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Boring exterior design
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Ugly hunchback form factor falsely marketed as "Coupe"
- Crossover nonsense
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Most engines are lethargic
- Fuel-cell not widely available
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.