Compare Hyundai Kona (OS) vs Audi Q3 Sportback (F3) vs Hyundai Kona (OS) facelift

Hyundai Kona (OS)

Audi Q3 Sportback (F3)

Hyundai Kona (OS) facelift

Hyundai Kona (OS)Audi Q3 Sportback (F3)Hyundai Kona (OS) facelift
Variants
1.0 T-GDi
1.6 CRDi 116
1.6 CRDi 136 AWD DCT
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
1.6 GDi 141 Hybrid DCT
1.6 T-GDi 177 DCT
1.6 T-GDi 177 AWD DCT
2.0 150 AT
2.0 150 AWD AT
39 kWh Electric
39.2 kWh Electric
64 kWh (204 Hp) Electric
35 TDI DCT
35 TDI quattro
35 TDI quattro DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
40 TDI 190 quattro DCT
40 TDI 200 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 230 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 245 quattro DCT
45 TFSI e DCT
1.0 T-GDi 120
1.6 CRDi 136
1.6 CRDi 136 AWD DCT
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
1.6 Turbo-GDI 195 AWD DCT
1.6 Turbo-GDI 195 DCT
2.0 MPI 147 AWD CVT
2.0 MPI 147 CVT
Electric
Electric Lite
Kona N

Reviews

Neofiliac score21%32%29%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good marketing
  • Up to 484km electric range
  • Interesting Kona N
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Independent rear suspensions only for AWD model
  • Impractical and ugly
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Ugly
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.