Compare Chrysler Aspen vs Jeep Wrangler JL
Variants
4.7 4WD
4.7
4.7 FlexFuel 4WD
4.7 FlexFuel
5.7 335 4WD
5.7 335
5.7 376 4WD
5.7 376
5.7 Hybrid 4WD
2.0 Rubicon
2.0 Sahara
2.0 Sport
2.2 Rubicon
2.2 Sahara
3.6 Rubicon
3.6 Rubicon MT
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
9.4 L / 9.9 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
102.0 L / 26.9 gal
Passengers
8
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 336x28 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 352x22 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone, Solid axle
Suspension | Rear
Solid axle
Multi-link, Solid axle
Turning Circle
12.2 m / 40.0 ft
Water Fording
760 mm / 29.9 in
Dimensions
Track Width | Front
1637.0 mm / 64.4 in
Wheelbase
3027 mm / 119.2 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
195 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.391
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
65%
72%
Pros
- High cargo capacity
- Powerful engines
- Solid on-road performance
- Superb offroad capabilities
- Small turning circle
- High cargo capacity
Cons
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- High 0.39 drag coefficient
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.