Compare Ford Ranger Double Cab vs Toyota Tundra 3 vs Ford Ranger

Variants
2.2 TDCi 125 4x4
2.2 TDCi 130
2.2 TDCi 130 4x4
2.2 TDCi 150 4x4
2.2 TDCi 150 4x4 AT
2.2 TDCi 160
2.2 TDCi 160 4x4
2.2 TDCi 160 4x4 AT
2.2 TDCi 160 AT
2.5 4x4
3.2 TDCi
3.2 TDCi 4x4
3.2 TDCi Euro5 4x4
3.2 TDCi Euro5 4x4 AT
3.2 TDCi 4x4 AT
3.2 TDCi Euro5 AT
CrewMax Short Bed 3.5
CrewMax Short Bed 3.5 4x4
CrewMax Short Bed 3.5 Hybrid
CrewMax Short Bed 3.5 Hybrid 4x4
CrewMax Short Bed TRD Pro Hybrid 4x4
CrewMax Standard Bed 3.5
CrewMax Standard Bed 3.5 4x4
CrewMax Standard Bed 3.5 Hybrid
CrewMax Standard Bed 3.5 Hybrid 4x4
Double Cab Long Bed 3.5 348
Double Cab Long Bed 3.5 389
Double Cab Long Bed 3.5 389 4x4
Double Cab Standard Bed 3.5 348
Double Cab Standard Bed 3.5 389
Double Cab Standard Bed 3.5 389 4x4
Double Cab 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4
Double Cab 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4
Double Cab 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4 AT
Double Cab 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4 AT
Double Cab 3.2 Duratorq 4x4
Double Cab 3.2 Duratorq 4x4 AT
Double Cab Raptor 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4 AT
Regular Cab 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4
Regular Cab 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4
Super Cab 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
1210 L / 42.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
12.4 L / 13.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
7.3 L / 7.7 qt
Fuel Capacity
80.0 L / 21.1 gal
80.0 L / 21.1 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 353 mm
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Ventilated discs, 345 mm
Offroad | Approach Angle
28.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
25.0 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
32.0 deg
35.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
28.0 deg
27.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Solid axle
Solid axle
Multi-link

Construction

Battery | Capacity
1.9 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Pickup

Dimensions

Size | Height
1815 mm / 71.5 in
1981 mm / 78.0 in
Wheelbase
3220 mm / 126.8 in
3220 mm / 126.8 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.40
0.36

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
LEV-III
Euro 6d-TEMP
Engine
V35A-FTS
Engine | Bore
85.5 mm / 3.4 in
84.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.4:1
16.0:1
Engine | Displacement
3.4 L / 210.2 cu-in / 3445.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
100.0 mm / 3.9 in
90.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Type
Bi-turbocharged direct- and multi-port-injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
10-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic ECT-i
Automatic

Production

Availability
2021
2019
Debut
2018 Detroit Auto Show
Made In
USA

Reviews

Neofiliac score
63%
79%
39%
Pros
  • Superb offroad capabilities
  • Good cargo capacity
  • Great styling
  • Good build quality
  • Superb offroad capabilities
  • Good offroad capabilities
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • High 0.40 drag coefficient
  • High 0.36 drag coefficient
  • Horrible turning circle
  • Poor performance
  • Underpowered

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.