Compare RAM 1500 IV Quad Cab vs Toyota Tundra 2 Regular Cab
Variants
3.0 EcoDiesel 4WD
3.0 EcoDiesel
3.6 4WD
3.6
3.7
4.7 4WD 6AT
4.7 4WD 5AT
4.7 5AT
4.7 6AT
5.7 Hemi 4WD 5AT
5.7 Hemi 5AT
5.7 Hemi 4WD 6AT
5.7 Hemi 6AT
4.0 236
4.0 236 Long
4.0 270
4.0 270 Long
4.6
4.6 4WD
4.6 4WD Long
4.6 Long
4.7
4.7 4WD
4.7 4WD Long
4.7 Long
5.7
5.7 4WD
5.7 4WD Long
5.7 Long
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
1628 L / 57.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
98.0 L / 25.9 gal
100.0 L / 26.4 gal
Passengers
3
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Solid axle
Solid axle
Tire Size
265/70 R17
Construction
Body Style
4-door Pickup
2-door Pickup
Dimensions
Track Width | Front
1725.0 mm / 67.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1725.0 mm / 67.9 in
Wheel Size
7.0J x 17
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.36
Powertrain
Engine | Bore
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
68%
60%
Pros
- Superb offroad capabilities
- Lots of loading capacity
- Good Hemi V8
- Superb offroad capabilities
- Best-in-class reliability
Cons
- High 0.36 drag coefficient
- Large turning circle
- Reliability issues
- Very high fuel consumption
- Large turning circle
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.