Compare Ford Fiesta 7 vs Toyota Yaris 3 vs Subaru Impreza 5 Hatchback

Variants
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 100 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.0 EcoBoost 125 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 125 MHEV
1.0 EcoBoost 140
1.0 EcoBoost 155 MHEV
1.0 EcoBoost 95
1.1 70
1.1 85
1.1 Ti-VCT 75
1.5D 120
1.5D 85
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
1.0
1.33
1.33 Euro6
1.33 Euro6 CVT
1.33 CVT
1.4 D-4D Euro6
1.4 D-4D
1.4
Hybrid Euro6
1.5
1.5 CVT
Hybrid
GRMN
1.6i CVT
2.0i CVT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
385 L / 13.6 cu-ft ~ 1310 L / 46.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.8 L / 8.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.4 L / 4.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
42.0 L / 11.1 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.8 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
12.9 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
25.5 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring, Elastic beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
3- / 5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
133 mm / 5.2 in
130 mm / 5.1 in
Size | Height
1510 mm / 59.4 in
1480 mm / 58.3 in
Size | Length
4460 mm / 175.6 in
Size | Width
1695 mm / 66.7 in
1775 mm / 69.9 in
Track Width | Front
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Wheelbase
2493 mm / 98.1 in
2510 mm / 98.8 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in

Performance

Towing Capacity
650 kg / 1433 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol flat-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
Lineartronic

Production

Availability
2016 ~ 2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
19%
21%
32%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Good front-end styling
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • CVT
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Bad CVT
  • Hybrid nonsense

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.