Compare Ford Fiesta 7 vs Ford Focus 3 vs Lexus CT 200h

Lexus CT 200h (ZWA10) Hatchback (2011-2017)

Ford | Cars

Lexus | Cars

Variants

1.0 EcoBoost 100

1.0 EcoBoost 100 AT

1.0 EcoBoost 125

1.0 EcoBoost 125 AT

1.0 EcoBoost 125 MHEV

1.0 EcoBoost 140

1.0 EcoBoost 155 MHEV

1.0 EcoBoost 95

1.1 70

1.1 85

1.1 Ti-VCT 75

1.5D 120

1.5D 85

ST 1.5 EcoBoost

1.0 EcoBoost 100

1.0 EcoBoost 125 AT

1.0 EcoBoost 125

1.5 EcoBoost 150

1.5 EcoBoost 182

1.5D 120

1.5D 95

1.5D 105

1.6 EcoBoost 150

1.6 EcoBoost 182

1.6D 105

1.6D 115

1.6D 95

1.6 105

1.6 125

1.6 125 AT

1.6 85

2.0D 140

2.0D 140 AT

2.0D 150 AT

2.0D 150

2.0D 163

2.0D 163 AT

RS 350 AWD

ST 250

ST TDCi 185

Euro6

Euro5

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

375 L / 13.2 cu-ft ~ 985 L / 34.8 cu-ft

Coolant Capacity

6.9 L / 7.3 qt

Engine Oil Capacity

4.2 L / 4.4 qt

Fuel Capacity

42.0 L / 11.1 gal

45.0 L / 11.9 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent, coil spring, Elastic beam

Multi-link

Double-wishbone

Turning Circle

10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Type

Lithium-ion

Battery | Voltage

325.0 V

Body Style

3- / 5-door Hatchback

5-door hybrid Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

133 mm / 5.2 in

130 mm / 5.1 in

Size | Width

1765 mm / 69.5 in

Track Width | Front

1525.0 mm / 60.0 in

Track Width | Rear

1520.0 mm / 59.8 in

Wheelbase

2493 mm / 98.1 in

2600 mm / 102.4 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h

10.3 sec

Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph

9.8 sec

Coefficient Of Drag

0.29

Top Speed

180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph

Towing Capacity

300 kg / 661 lbs (w/o brakes) | 400 kg / 882 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Engine

2ZR-FXE

Engine | Bore

80.5 mm / 3.2 in

Engine | Compression Ratio

13.0:1

Engine | Displacement

1.8 L / 109.7 cu-in / 1798.0 cc

Engine | Power

99.0 hp / 73.8 kW @ 5200 rpm + 82.0 hp / 61.1 kW (electric motor)

Engine | Specific Output

55.1 hp/L / 0.9 hp/cu-in

Engine | Stroke

88.3 mm / 3.5 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score

19%

55%

31%

Pros

Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Low fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Low fuel consumption
Potent engine lineup
Fully independent suspensions

Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Low official fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Cons

No powerful engine options
Only available with tiny engines
No independent rear suspensions

Generic design

Horrible 0-100kph time
Can't even reach 200km/h
Miserably low engine output
Poor handling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.