Compare Ford Fiesta 7 vs Hyundai i20 vs Mazda 2 III
Variants
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 100 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.0 EcoBoost 125 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 125 MHEV
1.0 EcoBoost 140
1.0 EcoBoost 155 MHEV
1.0 EcoBoost 95
1.1 70
1.1 85
1.1 Ti-VCT 75
1.5D 120
1.5D 85
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
1.0 T-GDi 100
1.0 T-GDi 100 DCT
1.0 T-GDi 120
1.0 T-GDi 120 DCT
1.2 MPi
i20 N
1.5 SkyActiv-D
1.5 SkyActiv-G 115
1.5 SkyActiv-G 75
1.5 SkyActiv-G 90
1.5 SkyActiv-G 90 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
280 L / 9.9 cu-ft ~ 950 L / 33.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
0.0 L / 0.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
42.0 L / 11.1 gal
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
44.0 L / 11.6 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
430 kg / 948 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc, 320 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 262 mm
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring, Elastic beam
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
215/40 R18
Turning Circle
10.5 m / 34.6 ft
Construction
Body Style
3- / 5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
133 mm / 5.2 in
143 mm / 5.6 in
Size | Height
1495 mm / 58.9 in
Size | Length
4060 mm / 159.8 in
Size | Width
1695 mm / 66.7 in | 1983 mm / 78.1 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1541.0 mm / 60.7 in
1485.0 mm / 58.5 in
Weight
1190.0 kg / 2623.5 lbs
Wheelbase
2493 mm / 98.1 in
2580 mm / 101.6 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
33.9 m / 111.2 ft
CO2 Emission
158 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Fuel Economy
7.0 L/100km / 33.6 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
229.0 km/h / 142.3 mph
Towing Capacity
450 kg / 992 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1110 kg / 2447 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
515 kg / 1135 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1100 kg / 2425 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
75.6 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Stroke
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
19%
35%
26%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Decent styling
- Low fuel consumption
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Very low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Only available with tiny engines
- Basic suspension setup
- Low build quality
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- Semi-independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.