HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Ford Focus 4 vs Hyundai i30 III Hatchback facelift vs Hyundai i20 II

Variants
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.0 EcoBoost 125 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 155
1.0 EcoBoost 85
1.5 EcoBlue 120
1.5 EcoBlue 120 AT
1.5 EcoBlue 95
1.5 EcoBoost 150
1.5 EcoBoost 150 AT
1.5 EcoBoost 182
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
ST 2.0 EcoBlue
ST 2.3 EcoBoost
ST 2.3 EcoBoost AT
1.0 T-GDi
1.0 T-GDi DCT
1.5 DPi
1.5 T-GDi
1.5 T-GDi DCT
1.6 CRDi 115
1.6 CRDi 115 DCT
1.6 CRDi 136
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
i30 N Performance
i30 N Performance DCT
1.0 T-GDI 100
1.0 T-GDI 101
1.0 T-GDI 101 DCT
1.0 T-GDI 120
1.0 T-GDI 120 Euro6d
1.0 T-GDI 120 Euro6d DCT
1.1 CRDi 75
1.2 75
1.2 75 Euro6d
1.2 84 Euro6d
1.2 84
1.4 100
1.4 100 AT
1.4 CRDi 90

Capacity

Engine Oil Capacity
3.3 L / 3.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc, 345 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 314 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
235/35 R19 Y
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.2 ft
10.2 m / 33.5 ft

Construction

Body Style
3- / 5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
112 mm / 4.4 in
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1474 mm / 58.0 in
Size | Length
4340 mm / 170.9 in
4035 mm / 158.9 in
Size | Width
1825 mm / 71.9 in | 1979 mm / 77.9 in (mirror unfolded) | 1848 mm / 72.8 in (mirror folded)
1795 mm / 70.7 in
Track Width | Front
1572.0 mm / 61.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1553.0 mm / 61.1 in
Wheel Size
8.0J x 19
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
34.6 m / 113.5 ft

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.5:1
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score
61%
32%
23%
Pros
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Very low fuel consumption
  • Strong styling
  • Independent rear suspensions
  • Decent build quality
  • Decent performance
  • Good handling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Decent exterior design
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.