Compare Ford B-MAX vs Ford Focus 3 vs Toyota Matrix E130

Variants
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 120
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.4 Duratec 90
1.5 TDCi 75
1.5 TDCi 95
1.6 Duratec 105 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.5 EcoBoost 150
1.5 EcoBoost 182
1.5D 120
1.5D 95
1.5D 105
1.6 EcoBoost 150
1.6 EcoBoost 182
1.6D 105
1.6D 115
1.6D 115
1.6D 95
1.6 105
1.6 125
1.6 125 AT
1.6 85
2.0D 140
2.0D 140 AT
2.0D 150 AT
2.0D 150
2.0D 163
2.0D 163 AT
RS 350 AWD
ST 250
ST TDCi 185
1.8 124PS AWD
1.8 124PS AWD AT
1.8 132PS
1.8 132PS AT
1.8 183PS

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
318 L / 11.2 cu-ft ~ 1386 L / 48.9 cu-ft
617 L / 21.8 cu-ft ~ 1507 L / 53.2 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.3 ft
9.8 m / 32.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
325.0 V
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Size | Height
1604 mm / 63.1 in
1540 mm / 60.6 in
Size | Length
4077 mm / 160.5 in
4350 mm / 171.3 in
Size | Width
1751 mm / 68.9 in | 2067 mm / 81.4 in (mirror unfolded) | 1857 mm / 73.1 in (mirror folded)
1775 mm / 69.9 in
Track Width | Front
1492.0 mm / 58.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1482.0 mm / 58.3 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2489 mm / 98.0 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in

Performance

Towing Capacity
300 kg / 661 lbs (w/o brakes) | 400 kg / 882 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder

Production

Availability
2002 ~ 2007

Reviews

Neofiliac score
11%
55%
16%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Easy entry and exit
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Potent engine lineup
  • Fully independent suspensions
  • Small turning circle
  • Reliable engines
Cons
  • Rather ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Poorly put together
  • Generic design
  • No powerful engine options
  • Boring design

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.