Compare Ford B-MAX vs Peugeot 308 vs Peugeot 208

Ford | Cars

Peugeot | Cars

Variants

1.0 EcoBoost 100

1.0 EcoBoost 120

1.0 EcoBoost 125

1.4 Duratec 90

1.5 TDCi 75

1.5 TDCi 95

1.6 Duratec 105 AT

1.4 VTi 95

1.4 VTi 98

1.6 e-HDi 112

1.6 e-HDi 115

1.6 HDi 109

1.6 HDi 90

1.6 HDi 92

1.6 THP 150

1.6 THP 150 AT

1.6 THP 156

1.6 THP 156 AT

1.6 THP 175

1.6 VTi 120

1.6 VTi 120 AT

2.0 HDi 136

2.0 HDi 136 AT

2.0 HDi 150

2.0 HDi 163 AT

GTi 200

1.0 PureTech

1.0 PureTech 2016+

1.0 VTi

1.2 PureTech 110

1.2 PureTech 110 AT

1.2 PureTech 110 Euro6d

1.2 PureTech 110 Euro6d AT

1.2 PureTech 82

1.2 PureTech 82 AT

1.2 PureTech 82 Euro6d

1.2 VTi 82

1.4 e-HDi

1.4 HDi

1.4 VTi 95

1.5 BlueHDi 102

1.6 BlueHDi 100

1.6 BlueHDi 120

1.6 BlueHDi 75

1.6 e-HDi 115

1.6 e-HDi 92 5MT

1.6 e-HDi 92 6MT

1.6 THP 155

1.6 THP 208

1.6 VTi 120

GTi 200

GTi 208

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

318 L / 11.2 cu-ft ~ 1386 L / 48.9 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

60.0 L / 15.9 gal

50.0 L / 13.2 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Turning Circle

10.4 m / 34.3 ft

10.7 m / 35.1 ft

Construction

Body Style

5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height

1604 mm / 63.1 in

1498 mm / 59.0 in

Size | Length

4077 mm / 160.5 in

4276 mm / 168.3 in

Size | Width

1751 mm / 68.9 in | 2067 mm / 81.4 in (mirror unfolded) | 1857 mm / 73.1 in (mirror folded)

Track Width | Front

1492.0 mm / 58.7 in

1526.0 mm / 60.1 in

Track Width | Rear

1482.0 mm / 58.3 in

1521.0 mm / 59.9 in

Wheelbase

2489 mm / 98.0 in

2608 mm / 102.7 in

2538 mm / 99.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.28

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 6

Engine | Redline

5000 rpm

Reviews

Neofiliac score

11%

18%

13%

Pros

Low fuel consumption
Small turning circle
Easy entry and exit

Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Low fuel consumption

Low official fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Cons

Rather ugly
Horrible 0-100kph time
Can't even reach 200km/h
Miserably low engine output
Only available with tiny engines
No independent rear suspensions
Poorly put together

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions

No powerful engine options
Only available with small, unreliable engines
No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.