Compare Peugeot 308 vs Peugeot 207 vs Toyota Aygo 2

Variants
1.4 VTi 95
1.4 VTi 98
1.6 e-HDi 112
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 HDi 109
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 150 AT
1.6 THP 156
1.6 THP 156 AT
1.6 THP 175
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
2.0 HDi 136
2.0 HDi 136 AT
2.0 HDi 150
2.0 HDi 163 AT
GTi 200
1.4 73
1.4 75
1.4 90
1.4 90 AT
1.4 HDi 68
1.4 HDi 70
1.4 VTi 95
1.4 VTi 95 Euro5
1.6 110
1.6 120
1.6 120 AT
1.6 HDi 110
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 156
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
RC
RC Euro5
Pre-facelift Automatic
Pre-facelift Manual

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft ~ 923 L / 32.6 cu-ft
168 L / 5.9 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
3.6 L / 3.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
2.8 L / 3.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
3-/5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1498 mm / 59.0 in
1472 mm / 58.0 in
1460 mm / 57.5 in
Size | Length
4276 mm / 168.3 in
Size | Width
1615 mm / 63.6 in
Track Width | Front
1526.0 mm / 60.1 in
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
1430.0 mm / 56.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1521.0 mm / 59.9 in
1420.0 mm / 55.9 in
Weight
860.0 kg / 1896.0 lbs
Wheel Size
14 in, 15 in
Wheelbase
2608 mm / 102.7 in
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2340 mm / 92.1 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
0.30
Top Speed
160.0 km/h / 99.4 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
71.0 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Displacement
1.0 L / 60.9 cu-in / 998.0 cc
Engine | Redline
5000 rpm
Engine | Stroke
84.0 mm / 3.3 in
Transmission | Gears
5-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
18%
8%
18%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Cute exterior design
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Very low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Unreliable transmissions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Very little cargo space

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.