Compare Peugeot 308 vs Hyundai i20 vs Peugeot 208

Variants
1.4 VTi 95
1.4 VTi 98
1.6 e-HDi 112
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 HDi 109
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 150 AT
1.6 THP 156
1.6 THP 156 AT
1.6 THP 175
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
2.0 HDi 136
2.0 HDi 136 AT
2.0 HDi 150
2.0 HDi 163 AT
GTi 200
1.0 T-GDi 100
1.0 T-GDi 100 DCT
1.0 T-GDi 120
1.0 T-GDi 120 DCT
1.2 MPi
i20 N
1.0 PureTech
1.0 PureTech 2016+
1.0 VTi
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 110 AT
1.2 PureTech 110 Euro6d
1.2 PureTech 110 Euro6d AT
1.2 PureTech 82
1.2 PureTech 82 AT
1.2 PureTech 82 Euro6d
1.2 VTi 82
1.4 e-HDi
1.4 HDi
1.4 VTi 95
1.5 BlueHDi 102
1.6 BlueHDi 100
1.6 BlueHDi 120
1.6 BlueHDi 75
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 e-HDi 92 5MT
1.6 e-HDi 92 6MT
1.6 THP 155
1.6 THP 208
1.6 VTi 120
GTi 200
GTi 208

Capacity

Coolant Capacity
0.0 L / 0.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
430 kg / 948 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc, 320 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc, 262 mm
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
215/40 R18
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
10.5 m / 34.6 ft

Dimensions

Size | Height
1498 mm / 59.0 in
Size | Length
4276 mm / 168.3 in
Track Width | Front
1526.0 mm / 60.1 in
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1521.0 mm / 59.9 in
1541.0 mm / 60.7 in
Weight
1190.0 kg / 2623.5 lbs
Wheelbase
2608 mm / 102.7 in
2580 mm / 101.6 in
2538 mm / 99.9 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
33.9 m / 111.2 ft
CO2 Emission
158 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Fuel Economy
7.0 L/100km / 33.6 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
229.0 km/h / 142.3 mph
Towing Capacity
450 kg / 992 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1110 kg / 2447 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
75.6 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Redline
5000 rpm
Engine | Stroke
89.0 mm / 3.5 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score
18%
35%
13%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Low build quality
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.