Compare Peugeot 207 vs Peugeot 308 III vs DS 4 II

Peugeot | Cars

DS Automobiles | Cars

Variants

1.4 73

1.4 75

1.4 90

1.4 90 AT

1.4 HDi 68

1.4 HDi 70

1.4 VTi 95

1.4 VTi 95 Euro5

1.6 110

1.6 120

1.6 120 AT

1.6 HDi 110

1.6 HDi 112

1.6 HDi 90

1.6 HDi 92

1.6 THP 150

1.6 THP 156

1.6 VTi 120

1.6 VTi 120 AT

RC Euro5

1.2 PureTech 110

1.2 PureTech 130

1.2 PureTech 130 AT

1.5 BlueHDi 130

1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT

1.6 PureTech Hybrid 180 AT

1.6 PureTech Hybrid 225 AT

1.2 PureTech 130

1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT

1.6 PureTech 181 AT

1.6 PureTech 225 AT

E-TENSE

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

270 L / 9.5 cu-ft ~ 923 L / 32.6 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

50.0 L / 13.2 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Power Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Torsion

Semi-independent, coil spring

Turning Circle

10.8 m / 35.5 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity

12.4 kWh (gross)

Battery | Type

Lithium-ion

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

140 mm / 5.5 in

189 mm / 7.4 in

Size | Height

1472 mm / 58.0 in

1490 mm / 58.7 in

Size | Length

4367 mm / 171.9 in

4400 mm / 173.2 in

Size | Width

1852 mm / 72.9 in | 2062 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1859 mm / 73.2 in (mirror folded)

1866 mm / 73.5 in | 2061 mm / 81.1 in (mirror unfolded)

Track Width | Front

1475.0 mm / 58.1 in

1559.0 mm / 61.4 in

1600.0 mm / 63.0 in

Track Width | Rear

1605.0 mm / 63.2 in

Wheelbase

2540 mm / 100.0 in

2675 mm / 105.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.30

0.28

Electric Range

55.0 km / 34.2 mi

Towing Capacity

750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 6.3

Engine

EB2DTS

Engine | Compression Ratio

10.5:1

Transmission | Gears

8-speed

Transmission | Type

Automatic

Production

Availability

2021

Reviews

Neofiliac score

26%

32%

Pros

Small turning circle
Low fuel consumption

Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Low fuel consumption
Improved styling

Low official fuel consumption
Much improved styling

Cons

No powerful engine options
Only available with small, unreliable engines
No independent rear suspensions
Unreliable transmissions

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.