Compare Peugeot 207 vs Ford B-MAX vs Ford Focus 3

Variants
1.4 73
1.4 75
1.4 90
1.4 90 AT
1.4 HDi 68
1.4 HDi 70
1.4 VTi 95
1.4 VTi 95 Euro5
1.6 110
1.6 120
1.6 120 AT
1.6 HDi 110
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 156
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
RC
RC Euro5
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 120
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.4 Duratec 90
1.5 TDCi 75
1.5 TDCi 95
1.6 Duratec 105 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.5 EcoBoost 150
1.5 EcoBoost 182
1.5D 120
1.5D 95
1.5D 105
1.6 EcoBoost 150
1.6 EcoBoost 182
1.6D 105
1.6D 115
1.6D 115
1.6D 95
1.6 105
1.6 125
1.6 125 AT
1.6 85
2.0D 140
2.0D 140 AT
2.0D 150 AT
2.0D 150
2.0D 163
2.0D 163 AT
RS 350 AWD
ST 250
ST TDCi 185

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft ~ 923 L / 32.6 cu-ft
318 L / 11.2 cu-ft ~ 1386 L / 48.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.3 ft

Construction

Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
325.0 V
Body Style
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1472 mm / 58.0 in
1604 mm / 63.1 in
Size | Length
4077 mm / 160.5 in
Size | Width
1751 mm / 68.9 in | 2067 mm / 81.4 in (mirror unfolded) | 1857 mm / 73.1 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
1492.0 mm / 58.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1482.0 mm / 58.3 in
Wheelbase
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2489 mm / 98.0 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Towing Capacity
300 kg / 661 lbs (w/o brakes) | 400 kg / 882 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6

Reviews

Neofiliac score
8%
11%
55%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Easy entry and exit
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Potent engine lineup
  • Fully independent suspensions
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Unreliable transmissions
  • Rather ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Poorly put together
  • Generic design

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.