Compare BMW i3 I01 vs Mini Countryman F60 vs Mini Hatch 3-door F56 LCI
Variants
22 kWh
22 kWh + Range Extender
Cooper
Cooper Euro6d
Cooper ALL4
Cooper ALL4 AT
Cooper 1.5 Euro6d AT
Cooper 1.5 AT
Cooper D
Cooper D Euro6d
Cooper D Euro6d ALL4
Cooper D ALL4
Cooper D ALL4 AT
Cooper D Euro6d ALL4 AT
Cooper D AT
Cooper D Euro6d AT
Cooper S Euro6d
Cooper S
Cooper S ALL4
Cooper S ALL4 AT
Cooper S AT
Cooper S Euro6d AT
Cooper S E ALL4
Cooper S E ALL4 Euro6d
Cooper SD Euro6d ALL4 AT
Cooper SD ALL4 AT
Cooper SD Euro6d AT
Cooper SD AT
JCW
JCW AT
One Euro6d
One
One AT
One Euro6d AT
One D
One D Euro6d
One D Euro6d AT
Cooper
Cooper Euro6d
Cooper AT
Cooper Euro6d AT
Cooper D
Cooper D AT
Cooper S
Cooper S Euro6d
Cooper S AT
Cooper S Euro6d AT
Cooper SD AT
One Euro6d
One
One AT
One Euro6d AT
One D
One First Euro6d
One First
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
260 L / 9.2 cu-ft ~ 1100 L / 38.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
9.0 L / 2.4 gal
Passengers
4
5
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
9.9 m / 32.3 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
22.0 kWh (gross) | 18.8 kWh (net)
7.6 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
360.0 V
Body Style
3-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
165 mm / 6.5 in
143 mm / 5.6 in
Size | Height
1578 mm / 62.1 in
1414 mm / 55.7 in
Size | Length
3999 mm / 157.4 in
4299 mm / 169.3 in
Size | Width
1775 mm / 69.9 in
1822 mm / 71.7 in
1727 mm / 68.0 in
Track Width | Front
1571.0 mm / 61.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
Wheelbase
2570 mm / 101.2 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in
2495 mm / 98.2 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
13 g/km
Electric Range
170.0 km / 105.6 mi
Fuel Economy
0.6 L/100km / 392.0 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
150.0 km/h / 93.2 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Production
Availability
2013 ~ 2017
Reviews
Neofiliac score
6%
26%
64%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Over low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Improved styling
- Improved engine reliability
- Superb, iconic styling
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Rather good handling
Cons
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Miserable electric range
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Questionable styling
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- PHEV nonsense
- Only available with small engines
- Euro 6d nonsense
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.