Compare Range Rover Evoque Coupe vs BMW X3 G01 vs Range Rover Velar L560 facelift
Variants
Si4 240PS AWD 6AT
Si4 240PS AWD 9AT
Si4 285PS AWD 9AT
TD4 150PS
TD4 150PS AWD
TD4 150PS AWD AT
TD4 180PS AWD
TD4 180PS AWD AT
eD4
SD4 190PS AWD
SD4 190PS 4WD 6AT
SD4 190PS AWD 9AT
TD4 150PS AWD AT
TD4 150PS AWD
xDrive20d Euro6d
xDrive20d
xDrive20i
xDrive25d
xDrive30d
xDrive30d Euro6d
xDrive30e
xDrive30i
M40d
M40d Euro6d
M40i 354PS Euro6d
M40i 360PS
M40i 360PS
M40i 382PS
D200
P250
P400e
D300
P340
P400
Capacity
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Offroad | Breakover Angle
20.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.3 m / 37.1 ft
Water Fording
500 mm / 19.7 in
530 mm / 20.9 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
17.1 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
354.0 V
Body Style
3-door Crossover
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
215 mm / 8.5 in
204 mm / 8.0 in
Size | Height
1676 mm / 66.0 in
1678 mm / 66.1 in
Size | Length
4797 mm / 188.9 in
Size | Width
2147 mm / 84.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 2041 mm / 80.4 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
1640.0 mm / 64.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1629.0 mm / 64.1 in
1657.0 mm / 65.2 in
Wheelbase
2660 mm / 104.7 in
2874 mm / 113.1 in
Performance
Electric Range
51.0 km / 31.7 mi
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Steptronic
Automatic
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
8%
70%
67%
Pros
- So ugly that many thought it had character
- Superb B-series engine lineup
- Much improved reliability
- Some offroad capabilities
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Still available in RWD
- Some interesting engine options
- More reliable than the bigger RRs
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Very tight inside
- Low cargo capacity
- Bad drivetrain
- MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad ZF 9HP transmission
- Pretends to be "SUV"
- PHEV nonsense
- Crossover nonsense
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.