Compare Chrysler 300 LD vs Chrysler Concorde II
Variants
3.6 286hp
3.6 292hp
3.6 AWD
5.7
5.7 AWD
SRT-8
2.7
3.2
3.5 237hp
3.5 258hp
3.5 Limited
Capacity
Passengers
5
5
Payload
531 kg / 1171 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Helical spring
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Length
5310 mm / 209.1 in
Wheelbase
3052 mm / 120.2 in
2870 mm / 113.0 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
227 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.334
Top Speed
240.0 km/h / 149.1 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
Chrysler 392 HEMI V8
Engine | Redline
6400 rpm
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
82%
7%
Pros
- Amazing Hemi engines (and OK V6s)
- One of the best styling from Chrysler
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Chrysler certainly did not copy anyone's design homework
Cons
- Bad diesel engine
- 8-speed is not universally used
- AWD nonsense
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Simple rear suspension
- Unique design language
- Unreliable powertrain
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.