Compare Chrysler Concorde II vs Chrysler 300 LD facelift
Variants
2.7
3.2
3.5 237hp
3.5 258hp
3.5 Limited
3.6 286
3.6 296
3.6 296 AWD
5.7
S 3.6 305
S 3.6 305 AWD
SRT 6.4
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
462 L / 16.3 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Helical spring
Multi-link
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Length
5310 mm / 209.1 in
Size | Width
1902 mm / 74.9 in
Wheelbase
2870 mm / 113.0 in
3052 mm / 120.2 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Towing Capacity
450 kg / 992 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1724 kg / 3801 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Redline
6400 rpm
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
2015
Reviews
Neofiliac score
7%
80%
Pros
- Chrysler certainly did not copy anyone's design homework
- Big HEMI V8
- Good handling dynamics
- Very comfortable
- Competitively priced
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Simple rear suspension
- Unique design language
- Unreliable powertrain
- Some reliability concerns
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.