HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Hyundai Elantra 5 MD vs Hyundai Elantra 4 HD vs Chevrolet Sonic

Variants
1.8
1.8 AT
1.6 CRDi
1.6
1.6 AT
2.0
2.0 AT
1.2 70PS
1.2 86PS
1.3D 75PS
1.3D 95PS
1.4 100PS
1.4 100PS AT
1.6
1.6 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
419 L / 14.8 cu-ft
460 L / 16.2 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
4.0 L / 4.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
48.0 L / 12.7 gal
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
46.0 L / 12.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson
Suspension | Rear
Torsion
Transverse stabilizer
Torsion
Tire Size
185/65 R15
Turning Circle
11.3 m / 37.1 ft
10.1 m / 33.0 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Platform
Hyundai-Kia J5 platform

Dimensions

Size | Height
1435 mm / 56.5 in
1490 mm / 58.7 in
1517 mm / 59.7 in
Size | Length
4529 mm / 178.3 in
4505 mm / 177.4 in
4399 mm / 173.2 in
Size | Width
1775 mm / 69.9 in
1775 mm / 69.9 in
1735 mm / 68.3 in
Track Width | Front
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
1543.0 mm / 60.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1562.0 mm / 61.5 in
1541.0 mm / 60.7 in
Wheel Size
5.5J X 15
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2690 mm / 105.9 in
2525 mm / 99.4 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Fuel Economy
7.1 L/100km / 33.1 MPG (combined) | 8.1 L/100km / 29.0 MPG (urban) | 5.9 L/100km / 39.9 MPG (highway)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
ULEV
Euro 5
Engine
G4NB
Engine | Bore
81.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
1.8 L / 109.7 cu-in / 1797.0 cc
Engine | Power
148.0 hp / 110.4 kW @ 6500 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
82.4 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
87.1 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
178 Nm / 131.3 lb-ft @ 4700 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2010 ~ 2015
2006 ~ 2011

Reviews

Neofiliac score
12%
3%
20%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Improved styling
  • Improved build quality
  • Somewhat improved build quality
  • Down to very low 3.7L/100km fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Not fully independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Questionable design
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.