Compare Ford Fusion vs Chevrolet Cruze facelift
Variants
2.3
3.0
1.4T
1.4T AT
1.7D
2.0D
2.0D AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
448 L / 15.8 cu-ft
469 L / 16.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
538 kg / 1186 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Independent, Spring MacPherson, with stabilizer
Suspension | Rear
Helical spring
Torsion
Tire Size
205/60 R16
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1417 mm / 55.8 in
1477 mm / 58.1 in
Size | Length
4831 mm / 190.2 in
4603 mm / 181.2 in
Size | Width
1834 mm / 72.2 in
1797 mm / 70.7 in
Track Width | Front
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1557.0 mm / 61.3 in
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2728 mm / 107.4 in
2685 mm / 105.7 in
Performance
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2005 ~ 2009
2013 ~ 2016
Reviews
Neofiliac score
8%
11%
Pros
- Handsome exterior design
- Decent exterior design
Cons
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.