Compare BMW 5 Series G30 vs Hyundai Sonata 4 EF facelift vs Hyundai Sonata 8
Variants
520d
520d ED AT
520d Mild Hybrid
520d Mild Hybrid xDrive
520d AT
520d xDrive AT
520i AT
525d AT
530d AT
530d xDrive AT
530e PHEV
530e PHEV xDrive
530e iPerformance
530i AT
530i xDrive AT
540d xDrive AT
540i AT
540i xDrive AT
M550d
M550i 462hp
M550i 530hp
1.8
1.8 AT
2.0 131hp
2.0 131hp AT
2.5 AT
2.7
2.7 AT
1.6 T-GDI AT
2.0 GDI Hybrid AT
2.5 GDI AT
2.5 Turbo GDI AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
430 L / 15.2 cu-ft
453 L / 16.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Vented 12"
Brakes | Rear
Disc
solid 11.2"
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Steering Ratio
13.27x
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
36.1 ft
Construction
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
351.0 V
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1422 mm / 56.0 in
1445 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4747 mm / 186.9 in
4900 mm / 192.9 in
Size | Width
1820 mm / 71.7 in
1859 mm / 73.2 in
Track Width | Front
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1633.0 mm / 64.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1623.0 mm / 63.9 in
Wheelbase
2975 mm / 117.1 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2840 mm / 111.8 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 3
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
1.6, 2.0, 2.5 L
Engine | Type
I4 Smartstream: G1.6 T-GDi, G2.0 LPi, G2.0 MPi, G2.0 GDi (Hybrid); G2.5 MPi, G2.5 GDi
Fuel Capacity
13.2 gal
Transmission | Gears
6- or 8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2001 ~ 2004
2020
Debut
2019-03
Made In
South Korea, US, China
Reviews
Neofiliac score
92%
29%
37%
Pros
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Up to 530hp of power and 760Nm of torque
- Excellent 0.22 drag coefficient
- Improved styling
- New engine optinos
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- Decent performance
- Decent exterior styling
Cons
- Generic exterior and interior design
- Too many electronics
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only MacPherston strut front suspensions
- Outdated transmissions
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.