Compare Sigma 70mm F2.8 DG Macro vs Zeiss Batis 135mm F2.8
Construction
Aperture Blades
9 blades
Form Factor
Short Telephoto Prime Lens
Medium Telephoto Prime Lens
Image Size
Full-Frame
Full-Frame
Lens Barrel
Distance scale, DoF scale
Lens Mount
Canon EF-mount, Nikon F-mount, Sigma SA-mount, Sony E-mount, Leica L-mount
Sony E-mount
Motor
Micromotor
Optical Formula | Elements
13 elements
14 elements
Optical Formula | Groups
10 groups
11 groups
Optical Formula | Special Glass
Two FLD glass elementsTwo SLD glass elementsTwo aspherical elements groups
Dimensions
Filter Diameter
49 mm / 1.93 in
67 mm / 2.64 in
Size | Diameter
71 mm / 2.80 in
98 mm / 3.86 in
Size | Length
106 mm / 4.17 in
120 mm / 4.72 in
Weight
515 g / 18.20 oz
614 g / 21.70 oz
Function
Angle Of View
34.4° Diagonal | 28.8° Horizontal | 19.5° Vertical
18.2° Diagonal | 15.2° Horizontal | 10.2° Vertical
Aperture
f/2.8 ~ f/22
f/2.8 ~ f/22
Autofocus
Yes
Yes
Focal Length
70 mm
135 mm
Focus Type
Extending front
Image Stabilization
No
Yes
Weather Resistance
Yes
Yes
Performance
Max Magnification
1x
0.18
Min Focus Distance
260 mm / 10.24 in
870 mm / 34.25 in
Production
Accessory
Lens Hood: LH708-01 (supplied)
Lens hood included
Debut
2018-02-27
2017-04-05
Made In
Japan
Reviews
Neofiliac score
91%
86%
Pros
- 1x maximum magnification
- Weather-sealed
- Rather lightweight for a 1:1 macro lens
- Optically stabilized
- Weather-sealed
- Exceptional image quality
- OLED display
Cons
- External focusing
- Built between Art and Contemporary line
- Barrel with large diameter
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.