Compare Zeiss Milvus 35mm F1.4 vs Zeiss Milvus 18mm F2.8
Construction
Aperture Blades
9 blades
Colors
Black
Form Factor
Wide-Angle Prime Lens
Ultra Wide-Angle Prime Lens
Image Size
Full-Frame
Full-Frame
Lens Barrel
Physical aperture ring, DoF scale
Physical aperture ring, Distance scale, DoF scale
Lens Mount
Canon EF-mount, Nikon F-mount
Canon EF-mount, Nikon F-mount
Optical Formula | Elements
14 elements
14 elements
Optical Formula | Groups
11 groups
12 groups
Optical Formula | Special Glass
ED elements + T* coating groups
4 APD, 2 ASPH elements, Zeiss T* coating groups
Dimensions
Filter Diameter
72 mm / 2.83 in
77 mm / 3.03 in
Size | Diameter
85 mm / 3.35 in
73 mm / 2.87 in
Size | Length
126 mm / 4.96 in
93 mm / 3.66 in
Weight
1174 g / 41.48 oz
721 g / 25.48 oz
Function
Angle Of View
63.5° Diagonal | 54.4° Horizontal | 37.8° Vertical
100.5° Diagonal | 90.0° Horizontal | 67.4° Vertical
Aperture
f/1.4 ~ f/16
f/2.8 ~ f/22
Autofocus
No
No
Focal Length
35 mm
18 mm
Focus Type
Internal
Image Stabilization
No
No
Weather Resistance
Yes
Yes
Performance
Max Magnification
0.22
0.14
Min Focus Distance
300 mm / 11.81 in
250 mm / 9.84 in
Production
Accessory
Lens hood included
Lens hood included
Debut
2017-06-21
2016-09-08
Made In
Japan
Japan
Reviews
Neofiliac score
86%
86%
Pros
- Bright maximum aperture
- Weather-sealed
- F-mount with physical aperture ring
- Excellent image quality
- Weather-sealed
- Exceptional image quality
- Solid build quality
- F-mount with physical aperture ring
Cons
- On the heavy side
- Quite large for a 35mm lens
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.