Compare Hyundai Kona facelift vs Volkswagen ID.4 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2 facelift

Variants
1.0 T-GDi 120
1.6 CRDi 136
1.6 CRDi 136 AWD DCT
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
1.6 Turbo-GDI 195 AWD DCT
1.6 Turbo-GDI 195 DCT
2.0 MPI 147 AWD CVT
2.0 MPI 147 CVT
Electric
Electric Lite
Kona N
ID.4 GTX
ID.4 Pro
ID.4 Pure
ID.4 Pure Performance
1.4 TSI eHybrid DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 150
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 122 DSG
2.0 TDI 150 4MOTION DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 4MOTION DSG
2.0 TSI 190 4MOTION DSG
2.0 TSI 245 4MOTION DSG
Tiguan R
1.5 TSI 150 DSG R-Line
2.0 TDI 150 4MOTION DSG R-Line

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
543 L / 19.2 cu-ft ~ 1575 L / 55.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Chassis Type
Unibody
Offroad | Approach Angle
17.5 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
17.1 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
20.6 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
21.2 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/40R19
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
11.5 m / 37.7 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross) | 10.4 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion
Body Style
Subcompact crossover
5-door battery-electric SUV
Colors
Sonic Blue, Phantom Black Pearl, Atlas White, Cyber Grey Metallic, Dark Knight Grey Pearl, Ignite Red, Performance Blue

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
201 mm / 7.9 in
Track Width | Front
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Electric Range
59.0 km / 36.7 mi

Powertrain

Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2020
Debut
2020-09-23

Reviews

Neofiliac score
29%
50%
19%
Pros
  • Up to 484km electric range
  • Interesting Kona N
  • Up to extraordinary 522km electric range
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Small turning circle
  • Decent engines
  • Down to very low 1.8L/100km fuel consumption
Cons
  • Ugly
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • BEV nonsense
  • Very ugly
  • Only available with small engines
  • Horrible suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.