Compare Mercedes EQS vs Peugeot 508 II vs Honda Clarity
Variants
AMG EQS 53 4MATIC+
AMG EQS 53 4MATIC+ AMG DYNAMIC PLUS
EQS 350
EQS 450+
EQS 580 4MATIC
1.2 PureTech 131 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.6 PureTech 180 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 160 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT
1.6 PureTech 225 AT
1.6 PureTech 225 PHEV
1.6 PSE AWD AT
Fuel Cell
Plug-in Hybrid
Electric
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
610 L / 21.5 cu-ft ~ 1770 L / 62.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
26.0 L / 6.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Chassis Type
Unibody
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/45 R18
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
11.7 m / 38.4 ft
Construction
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
400.0 V
Body Style
5-door battery-electric Sedan
Platform
Mercedes MEA
Dimensions
Size | Height
1478 mm / 58.2 in
Size | Length
4750 mm / 187.0 in
4895 mm / 192.7 in
Size | Width
1926 mm / 75.8 in | 2125 mm / 83.7 in (mirror unfolded)
1877 mm / 73.9 in
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in
Wheel Size
8J x 18
Wheelbase
3210 mm / 126.4 in
2751 mm / 108.3 in
Performance
Fuel Economy
5.6 L/100km / 42.0 MPG (combined) | 5.3 L/100km / 44.4 MPG (urban) | 5.9 L/100km / 39.9 MPG (highway)
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Engine | Bore
73.0 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.5 L / 91.4 cu-in / 1498.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
68.8 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
89.5 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Torque
134 Nm / 98.8 lb-ft @ 5000 rpm + 315 Nm / 232.3 lb-ft @ 0-2000 rpm
Engine | Type
Permanently excited synchronous motor (PSM)
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2021
Debut
2021-04-15 (Auto Shanghai 2021)
Made In
Germany
Reviews
Neofiliac score
82%
42%
50%
Pros
- Great performance
- Up to extraordinary 700km electric range
- Great comfort
- Excellent 0.20 drag coefficient
- Improved exterior styling
- Improved interior quality
- Low fuel consumption
- Distinct styling
- Fuel cell
Cons
- Extremely ugly
- Too many electronic gimmicks
- Short full-electric range
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Not meant for volume production
- Lack of fuel cell infrastructure
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.