Compare Nissan Qashqai 3 vs Honda CR-V 5 vs Chevrolet Captiva

Chevrolet Captiva / Holden Captiva Crossover (2006-2018)

Nissan | Cars

Honda | Cars

Chevrolet | Cars

Variants

1.3 140

1.3 158

1.3 AWD CVT

1.3 CVT

1.5 173

1.5 173 AWD

1.5 190 AWD CVT

1.5 190 CVT

1.5 193 AWD CVT

1.6d 120 AT

1.6d 120 AWD AT

1.6d 160 AWD

1.6d 160 AWD AT

2.0 AWD CVT

2.0 CVT

2.0 Hybrid

2.0 Hybrid AWD

2.0 Hybrid Euro6d

2.0 Hybrid Euro6d AWD

2.4 AWD CVT

2.4 CVT

2.0 VCDi 127

2.0 VCDi 127 AWD

2.0 VCDi 150

2.0 VCDi 150 AWD

2.0 VCDi 150 AWD AT

2.2 VCDi 163

2.2 VCDi 163 AT

2.2 VCDi 163 AWD

2.2 VCDi 184 AT

2.2 VCDi 184 AWD

2.2 VCDi 184 AWD AT

2.4

2.4 AWD

2.4 AWD AT

2.4 Ecotec 167

2.4 Ecotec 167 AT

2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD

2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD AT

3.0 AWD AT

3.2 AWD AT

Sport 2.4 AT

Capacity

Fuel Capacity

55.0 L / 14.5 gal

Passengers

5 / 7

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Offroad | Approach Angle

18.2 deg

Offroad | Departure Angle

22.7 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Turning Circle

11.1 m / 36.4 ft

Construction

Body Style

5-door mild-hybrid Crossover

5-door SUV

Platform

Nissan CMF-C platform

Dimensions

Size | Height

1625 mm / 64.0 in

Size | Length

4425 mm / 174.2 in

Size | Width

1835 mm / 72.2 in | 2084 mm / 82.0 in (mirror unfolded)

Track Width | Front

1580.0 mm / 62.2 in

Track Width | Rear

1586.0 mm / 62.4 in

Wheelbase

2665 mm / 104.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.38

Powertrain

Emission Standard

EURO 6d-ISC-FCM

Engine | Bore

72.2 mm / 2.8 in

Engine | Compression Ratio

10.5:1

Engine | Displacement

1.3 L / 81.3 cu-in / 1332.0 cc

Engine | Stroke

81.3 mm / 3.2 in

Engine | Type

Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder

Transmission | Gears

6-speed

Production

Availability

2021

Debut

2021-02-18

Made In

Reviews

Neofiliac score

41%

45%

Pros

Cheap to buy

High cargo capacity
Good towing capacity
Good engine reliability

Reasonable drivetrain reliability
Good towing capacity

Cons

Very ugly
Horrible build quality
Horrible 0-100kph time
Only available with tiny engines
Waste of raw materials

Bad 0-100kph time
No powerful engine options
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Horrible CVT

Very ugly
Bad 0-100kph time
High 0.38 drag coefficient
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.