Compare Mercedes S-Class W223 vs BMW 5 Series G30 LCI vs Cadillac CT6
Variants
S 350d
S 350d 4MATIC LWB
S 350d LWB
S 400d 4MATIC
S 400d 4MATIC LWB
S 450 4MATIC
S 450 4MATIC LWB
S 500 4MATIC
S 500 4MATIC LWB
S 580 4MATIC
S 580 4MATIC LWB
S 580e
S 580e 4MATIC
S 580e LWB
520d
520d xDrive
520e
520i
530d
530d xDrive
530e
530e xDrive
530i
530i xDrive
540d xDrive
540i
540i xDrive
545e xDrive
M550i xDrive
2.0T
2.0T (340 Hp) PHEV
2.0T PHEV
3.0T V6 AWD
3.6L V6 AWD
CT6-V Blackwing
Capacity
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Chassis Type
Unibody
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.7 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
15.9 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
245/45 R19; 245/40 R20
Construction
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
354.0 V
Body Style
Full-size sedan
Platform
Mercedes-Benz MRA
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
130 mm / 5.1 in
Size | Height
1503 mm / 59.2 in
Size | Width
1868 mm / 73.5 in
Wheelbase
2975 mm / 117.1 in
3109 mm / 122.4 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.22
0.30
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2100 kg / 4630 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6D-ISC-FCM
Fuel Capacity
73.8 L
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
10-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Steptronic
Automatic
Production
Debut
2020-09-02
2016-10-12
2015 New York Auto Show
Facelift
2020-05-27
Made In
Germany, China, Austria, Thailand
US: Michigan; China: Shanghai
Reviews
Neofiliac score
84%
83%
86%
Pros
- Good performance
- Great comfort
- Excellent 0.22 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Decent performance
- Improved base engines
- Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
- Low official fuel consumption
- Multi-link suspension on all four corners
- Surprisingly good handling for a large sedan
- Up to 550hp and 868Nm of torque (CT6-V)
- Down to very low 1.7L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
Cons
- Ugly design
- 4MATIC force-fed to the consumers
- No more V12
- Too many electronics
- Stupid emission control systems
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.