Compare Hyundai i30 III Hatchback facelift vs Ford Focus 4 vs Ford Focus 3

Variants
1.0 T-GDi
1.0 T-GDi DCT
1.5 DPi
1.5 T-GDi
1.5 T-GDi DCT
1.6 CRDi 115
1.6 CRDi 115 DCT
1.6 CRDi 136
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
i30 N Performance
i30 N Performance DCT
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.0 EcoBoost 125 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 155
1.0 EcoBoost 85
1.5 EcoBlue 120
1.5 EcoBlue 120 AT
1.5 EcoBlue 95
1.5 EcoBoost 150
1.5 EcoBoost 150 AT
1.5 EcoBoost 182
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
ST 2.0 EcoBlue
ST 2.3 EcoBoost
ST 2.3 EcoBoost AT
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.5 EcoBoost 150
1.5 EcoBoost 182
1.5D 120
1.5D 95
1.5D 105
1.6 EcoBoost 150
1.6 EcoBoost 182
1.6D 105
1.6D 115
1.6D 115
1.6D 95
1.6 105
1.6 125
1.6 125 AT
1.6 85
2.0D 140
2.0D 140 AT
2.0D 150 AT
2.0D 150
2.0D 163
2.0D 163 AT
RS 350 AWD
ST 250
ST TDCi 185

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc, 345 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 314 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/35 R19 Y
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.2 ft

Construction

Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
325.0 V

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
112 mm / 4.4 in
Size | Length
4340 mm / 170.9 in
Size | Width
1795 mm / 70.7 in
1825 mm / 71.9 in | 1979 mm / 77.9 in (mirror unfolded) | 1848 mm / 72.8 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1572.0 mm / 61.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1553.0 mm / 61.1 in
Wheel Size
8.0J x 19
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
34.6 m / 113.5 ft
Towing Capacity
300 kg / 661 lbs (w/o brakes) | 400 kg / 882 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.5:1
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score
32%
61%
55%
Pros
  • Decent build quality
  • Decent performance
  • Good handling
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Very low fuel consumption
  • Strong styling
  • Independent rear suspensions
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Potent engine lineup
  • Fully independent suspensions
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Only available with small engines
  • Generic design

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.