Compare Hyundai i20 vs Peugeot 208 vs Peugeot 308 III

Hyundai Motor | Cars

Peugeot | Cars

Variants

1.0 T-GDi 100

1.0 T-GDi 100 DCT

1.0 T-GDi 120

1.0 T-GDi 120 DCT

1.2 MPi

i20 N

1.0 PureTech

1.0 PureTech 2016+

1.0 VTi

1.2 PureTech 110

1.2 PureTech 110 AT

1.2 PureTech 110 Euro6d

1.2 PureTech 110 Euro6d AT

1.2 PureTech 82

1.2 PureTech 82 AT

1.2 PureTech 82 Euro6d

1.2 VTi 82

1.4 e-HDi

1.4 HDi

1.4 VTi 95

1.5 BlueHDi 102

1.6 BlueHDi 100

1.6 BlueHDi 120

1.6 BlueHDi 75

1.6 e-HDi 115

1.6 e-HDi 92 5MT

1.6 e-HDi 92 6MT

1.6 THP 155

1.6 THP 208

1.6 VTi 120

GTi 200

GTi 208

1.2 PureTech 110

1.2 PureTech 130

1.2 PureTech 130 AT

1.5 BlueHDi 130

1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT

1.6 PureTech Hybrid 180 AT

1.6 PureTech Hybrid 225 AT

Capacity

Coolant Capacity

0.0 L / 0.0 qt

Fuel Capacity

40.0 L / 10.6 gal

50.0 L / 13.2 gal

Passengers

Payload

430 kg / 948 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Disc, 320 mm

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc, 262 mm

Disc

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent, Torsion

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Torsion

Tire Size

215/40 R18

Turning Circle

10.5 m / 34.6 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity

12.4 kWh (gross)

Battery | Type

Lithium-ion

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

140 mm / 5.5 in

Size | Length

4367 mm / 171.9 in

Size | Width

1852 mm / 72.9 in | 2062 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1859 mm / 73.2 in (mirror folded)

Track Width | Front

1544.0 mm / 60.8 in

1559.0 mm / 61.4 in

Track Width | Rear

1541.0 mm / 60.7 in

Weight

1190.0 kg / 2623.5 lbs

Wheelbase

2580 mm / 101.6 in

2538 mm / 99.9 in

2675 mm / 105.3 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0

33.9 m / 111.2 ft

CO2 Emission

158 g/km

Coefficient Of Drag

0.28

Fuel Economy

7.0 L/100km / 33.6 MPG (combined)

Top Speed

229.0 km/h / 142.3 mph

Towing Capacity

450 kg / 992 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1110 kg / 2447 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 6d

Engine

EB2DTS

Engine | Bore

75.6 mm / 3.0 in

Engine | Compression Ratio

10.0:1

10.5:1

Engine | Stroke

89.0 mm / 3.5 in

Production

Availability

2021

Reviews

Neofiliac score

35%

13%

26%

Pros

Decent styling
Low fuel consumption

Low official fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Low fuel consumption
Improved styling

Cons

Only available with tiny engines
Basic suspension setup
Low build quality

No powerful engine options
Only available with small, unreliable engines
No independent rear suspensions

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.