Compare Mercedes GLE W167 vs Range Rover Velar L560 facelift vs Range Rover Evoque Coupe
Variants
AMG GLE 53
AMG GLE 63
AMG GLE 63 S
GLE 300d
GLE 350d
GLE 350de
GLE 400d
GLE 450
GLE 580
D200
P250
P400e
D300
P340
P400
Si4 240PS AWD 6AT
Si4 240PS AWD 9AT
Si4 285PS AWD 9AT
TD4 150PS
TD4 150PS AWD
TD4 150PS AWD AT
TD4 180PS AWD
TD4 180PS AWD AT
eD4
SD4 190PS AWD
SD4 190PS 4WD 6AT
SD4 190PS AWD 9AT
TD4 150PS AWD AT
TD4 150PS AWD
Capacity
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
23.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
15.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
23.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.0 m / 39.4 ft
11.3 m / 37.1 ft
Water Fording
500 mm / 19.7 in
530 mm / 20.9 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
31.2 kWh (gross) | 27.0 kWh (net)
17.1 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
3-door Crossover
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
180 mm / 7.1 in
215 mm / 8.5 in
Size | Height
1678 mm / 66.1 in
Size | Length
4924 mm / 193.9 in
4797 mm / 188.9 in
Size | Width
2147 mm / 84.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 2041 mm / 80.4 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1640.0 mm / 64.6 in
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1657.0 mm / 65.2 in
1629.0 mm / 64.1 in
Wheelbase
2995 mm / 117.9 in
2874 mm / 113.1 in
2660 mm / 104.7 in
Performance
Electric Range
93.0 km / 57.8 mi
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
15.5:1
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
9-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
9G-Tronic automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
2019
2020
Debut
2018 Paris Motor Show
Made In
USA, Thailand, Indonesia
Reviews
Neofiliac score
79%
67%
8%
Pros
- Great performance
- Some offroad capabilities
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Good drivetrain reliability
- Some interesting engine options
- More reliable than the bigger RRs
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- So ugly that many thought it had character
Cons
- Crossover nonsense
- Crossover nonsense
- Very tight inside
- Low cargo capacity
- Bad drivetrain
- MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad ZF 9HP transmission
- Pretends to be "SUV"
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.