Compare Jeep Cherokee KL vs Ford Kuga 2
Variants
2.0 272 AT
2.0 272 AWD AT
2.0 Multijet II 140
2.0 Multijet II 140 AWD
2.0 Multijet II 170 AWD AT
2.2 MultiJet II 185 AWD AT
2.2 MultiJet II 195 AT
2.2 MultiJet II 195 AWD AT
2.2 MultiJet II 200 AWD AT
2.2 MultiJet II 200 AWD AT
2.4 177 AT
2.4 177 AWD AT
2.4 180 AT
2.4 180 AWD AT
3.2 271 AT
3.2 272 AWD AT
1.5 120
1.5 150
1.5 182 4x4 AT
1.5 TDCI 120
1.5 TDCI 120 AT
1.6 150
1.6 150 4x4 AT
1.6 182 4x4 AT
2.0 242 4x4 AT
2.0 TDCi 140
2.0 TDCi 140 4x4
2.0 TDCi 140 4x4 AT
2.0 TDCI 150
2.0 TDCI 150 4x4
2.0 TDCI 150 4x4 AT
2.0 TDCi 163 4x4
2.0 TDCi 163 4x4 AT
2.0 TDCI 180 4x4
2.0 TDCI 180 4x4 AT
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Wheelbase
2690 mm / 105.9 in
Powertrain
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
24%
19%
Pros
- Some offroad capabilities
- Decent drivetrain reliability
Cons
- Poor performance
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Ugly
- Crossover nonsense
- Disgrace to the Cherokee name
- Uglier than the original
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.