Compare Mercedes-Benz CLA C118 vs Audi RS 3 (8Y) vs Audi A3 (8V) facelift

Mercedes-Benz CLA C118

Audi RS 3 (8Y)

Audi A3 (8V) facelift

Mercedes-Benz CLA C118Audi RS 3 (8Y)Audi A3 (8V) facelift
Variants
AMG CLA 35 4MATIC
AMG CLA 45 4MATIC+
AMG CLA 45 S 4MATIC+
CLA 180 MT
CLA 180
CLA 180d
CLA 200 MT
CLA 200
CLA 200d
CLA 220 4MATIC
CLA 220
CLA 220d
CLA 250 4MATIC
CLA 250
CLA 250e
1.0 TFSI
1.0 TFSI S-tronic
1.4 TFSI
1.4 TFSI S-tronic
1.5 TFSI
1.5 TFSI S-tronic
1.6 TDI
1.6 TDI S-tronic
2.0 TDI 150hp
2.0 TDI 150hp quattro
2.0 TDI 150hp S-tronic
2.0 TDI 184hp quattro S-tronic
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI quattro S-tronic
2.0 TFSI S-tronic
30 TDI
30 TDI S-tronic
30 TFSI
30 TFSI S-tronic
35 TDI S-tronic
35 TFSI
35 TFSI S-tronic

Reviews

Neofiliac score35%54%45%
Pros
  • Decent performance in the AMG models
  • Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
  • Decent performance
  • Exclusive access to the inline-5 engine
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 3.7L/100km fuel consumption
Cons
  • Mass-produced "AMG" engines not true to AMG
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Ugly
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Rather weird proportions
  • Questionable styling
  • Confusing new nomenclature
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.