Compare Mercedes CLA C118 vs Skoda Rapid vs Skoda Superb B6

Mercedes-Benz | Cars

Skoda | Cars

Variants

AMG CLA 35 4MATIC

AMG CLA 45 4MATIC+

AMG CLA 45 S 4MATIC+

CLA 180 MT

CLA 180

CLA 180d

CLA 200 MT

CLA 200

CLA 200d

CLA 220 4MATIC

CLA 220

CLA 220d

CLA 250 4MATIC

CLA 250

CLA 250e

1.0 TSI 110

1.0 TSI 95

1.0 TSI 95 AT

1.2 MPI 75

1.2 TSI 105

1.2 TSI 110

1.2 TSI 85

1.2 TSI 90

1.2 TSI 90 DSG

1.4 TDI 90

1.4 TDI 90 AT

1.4 TDI 90 DSG

1.4 TSI 122

1.4 TSI 125 AT

1.4 TSI 125 DSG

1.6 MPI 110

1.6 MPI 110 AT

1.6 MPI 90

1.6 TDI 115

1.6 TDI 116

1.6 TDI 105

1.4 TSI

1.6 TDI

1.8 TSI

1.8 TSI 4x4

1.8 TSI DSG

1.9 TDI

2.0 TDI 140PS

2.0 TDI 170PS

2.0 TDI 170PS DSG

2.0 TDI 170PS DSG 4x4

2.0 TSI

3.6 FSI DSG 4x4

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

460 L / 16.2 cu-ft

550 L / 19.4 cu-ft ~ 1490 L / 52.6 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

55.0 L / 14.5 gal

60.0 L / 15.9 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Offroad | Approach Angle

13.4 deg

14.0 deg

14.5 deg

Offroad | Breakover Angle

9.4 deg

Offroad | Departure Angle

14.3 deg

12.3 deg

12.0 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Semi-independent, Torsion

Multi-link

Turning Circle

11.1 m / 36.4 ft

10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity

15.6 kWh (gross)

Body Style

5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

104 mm / 4.1 in

136 mm / 5.4 in

139 mm / 5.5 in

Size | Height

1461 mm / 57.5 in

Size | Length

4688 mm / 184.6 in

4483 mm / 176.5 in

4838 mm / 190.5 in

Track Width | Front

1612.0 mm / 63.5 in

Track Width | Rear

1518.0 mm / 59.8 in

Wheelbase

2729 mm / 107.4 in

2602 mm / 102.4 in

2761 mm / 108.7 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.24

0.30

Electric Range

72.0 km / 44.7 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Engine | Bore

72.2 mm / 2.8 in

Engine | Compression Ratio

10.6:1

Engine | Stroke

81.4 mm / 3.2 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score

35%

13%

60%

Pros

Decent performance in the AMG models
Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient

Low official fuel consumption

Rather clean exterior styling
Very competitive vis-a-vis B6/B7 Passat
Interesting engine lineup

Cons

Mass-produced "AMG" engines not true to AMG
Only available with small engines
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Ugly

Bad 0-100kph time
Miserably low engine output
Only available with small, unreliable engines
No fully independent suspensions

Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
FSI problems
DSG problems

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.