Compare Mercedes CLA C118 vs Mercedes C-class W204 facelift vs Mercedes C-class W205
Variants
AMG CLA 35 4MATIC
AMG CLA 45 4MATIC+
AMG CLA 45 S 4MATIC+
CLA 180 MT
CLA 180
CLA 180d
CLA 200 MT
CLA 200
CLA 200d
CLA 220 4MATIC
CLA 220
CLA 220d
CLA 250 4MATIC
CLA 250
CLA 250e
C 63 AMG
C 180
C 180 CDI
C 180 CDI MT
C 180 MT
C 200
C 200 CDI
C 200 CDI MT
C 200 MT
C 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY
C 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY MT
C 250
C 250 CDI
C 250 CDI 4MATIC
C 250 CDI MT
C 300 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 4MATIC
C 350
C 350 4MATIC
C 350 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY
C 63 AMG Performance
AMG C 43 4MATIC
AMG C 63
AMG C 63 S
C 160 MT
C 180 7AT
C 180 9AT
C 180 MT
C 180d 7AT
C 180d MT
C 200 4MATIC 7AT
C 200 4MATIC 9AT
C 200 7AT
C 200 9AT
C 200 MT
C 200d 7AT
C 200d MT
C 220d 4MATIC 9AT
C 220d 7AT
C 220d 9AT
C 220d BlueEFFICIENCY Edition 7AT
C 220d MT
C 250 7AT
C 250 9AT
C 250d 4MATIC 7AT
C 250d 4MATIC 9AT
C 250d 7AT
C 250d 9AT
C 300 7AT
C 300 9AT
C 300h HYBRID 7AT
C 350e PHEV 7AT
C 400 4MATIC 7AT
C 400 4MATIC 9AT
C 450 4MATIC AMG
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
460 L / 16.2 cu-ft
475 L / 16.8 cu-ft
Passengers
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.4 deg
13.5 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
9.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
14.3 deg
14.2 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
15.6 kWh (gross)
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
104 mm / 4.1 in
92 mm / 3.6 in
Size | Height
1447 mm / 57.0 in
Size | Length
4688 mm / 184.6 in
Track Width | Front
1612.0 mm / 63.5 in
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
Wheelbase
2729 mm / 107.4 in
2760 mm / 108.7 in
2840 mm / 111.8 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.24
Electric Range
72.0 km / 44.7 mi
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
72.2 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.6:1
Engine | Redline
8000 rpm
Engine | Stroke
81.4 mm / 3.2 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
35%
84%
86%
Pros
- Decent performance in the AMG models
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- Last chance to get M156 in C63 AMG
- Somewhat improved styling
- Reasonably reliable engine lineup
- Good towing capacity
- Lots of power in the C63 AMG models
- Great double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
Cons
- Mass-produced "AMG" engines not true to AMG
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Ugly
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Addicted to 4MATIC
- Somewhat generic styling
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.