Compare Mercedes CLA C118 vs Ford Mondeo 4 vs Ford Focus 3 Sedan

Mercedes-Benz | Cars

Ford | Cars

Variants

AMG CLA 35 4MATIC

AMG CLA 45 4MATIC+

AMG CLA 45 S 4MATIC+

CLA 180 MT

CLA 180

CLA 180d

CLA 200 MT

CLA 200

CLA 200d

CLA 220 4MATIC

CLA 220

CLA 220d

CLA 250 4MATIC

CLA 250

CLA 250e

1.0T

1.5T

1.5T AT

1.5D

1.5D Econetic

1.6D

1.6D Econetic

2.0T 203hp AT

2.0T 240hp AT

Hybrid

2.0D 150hp

2.0D 150hp AWD

2.0D 150hp Econetic

2.0D 150hp AT

2.0D 180hp

2.0D 180hp Econetic

2.0D 180hp AT

2.0D 180hp AWD AT

2.0D 210hp AT

1.0T 100hp

1.0T 125hp

1.6T 150hp

1.6T 182hp

1.6D 115hp

1.6D 115hp start/stop

1.6D 95hp

1.6D 95hp start/stop

1.6T AT

2.0D 140hp

2.0D 140hp AT

2.0D 163hp

2.0D 163hp AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

460 L / 16.2 cu-ft

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Offroad | Approach Angle

13.4 deg

Offroad | Breakover Angle

9.4 deg

Offroad | Departure Angle

14.3 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Tire Size

215/60 R16, 235/50 R17, 235/45 R18, 235/40 R19

Turning Circle

11.1 m / 36.4 ft

11.6 m / 38.0 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity

15.6 kWh (gross)

1.4 kWh (gross)

Body Style

4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

104 mm / 4.1 in

128 mm / 5.0 in

Size | Length

4688 mm / 184.6 in

Track Width | Front

1612.0 mm / 63.5 in

1599.0 mm / 63.0 in

Track Width | Rear

1595.0 mm / 62.8 in

Wheel Size

6.5J x 16, 7.5J x 17, 8J x 18, 8J x 19

Wheelbase

2729 mm / 107.4 in

2850 mm / 112.2 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.24

Electric Range

72.0 km / 44.7 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 5

Engine | Bore

72.2 mm / 2.8 in

Engine | Compression Ratio

10.6:1

Engine | Stroke

81.4 mm / 3.2 in

Engine | Torque

170 Nm / 125.4 lb-ft

Transmission | Gears

6-speed

Production

Availability

2010 ~ 2014

Reviews

Neofiliac score

35%

37%

Pros

Decent performance in the AMG models
Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient

Down to very low 3.6L/100km fuel consumption
Good towing capacity

Cute exterior design

Cons

Mass-produced "AMG" engines not true to AMG
Only available with small engines
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Ugly

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

No powerful engine options
Questionable automatic transmission
NVH issues
Basic suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.