HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Mercedes CLA C118 vs Ford Mondeo 4 vs Ford Taurus 4

Variants
AMG CLA 35 4MATIC
AMG CLA 45 4MATIC+
AMG CLA 45 S 4MATIC+
CLA 180 MT
CLA 180
CLA 180d
CLA 200 MT
CLA 200
CLA 200d
CLA 220 4MATIC
CLA 220
CLA 220d
CLA 250 4MATIC
CLA 250
CLA 250e
1.0T
1.5T
1.5T AT
1.5D
1.5D Econetic
1.6D
1.6D Econetic
2.0T 203hp AT
2.0T 240hp AT
Hybrid
2.0D 150hp
2.0D 150hp AWD
2.0D 150hp Econetic
2.0D 150hp AT
2.0D 180hp
2.0D 180hp Econetic
2.0D 180hp AT
2.0D 180hp AWD AT
2.0D 210hp AT
3.0 155hp
3.0 200hp
3.0 201hp

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
460 L / 16.2 cu-ft
481 L / 17.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
9.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
14.3 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/60 R16, 235/50 R17, 235/45 R18, 235/40 R19
215/60 R16
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
12.1 m / 39.7 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
15.6 kWh (gross)
1.4 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
104 mm / 4.1 in
128 mm / 5.0 in
Size | Height
1425 mm / 56.1 in
Size | Length
4688 mm / 184.6 in
5019 mm / 197.6 in
Size | Width
1854 mm / 73.0 in
Track Width | Front
1612.0 mm / 63.5 in
1599.0 mm / 63.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
1577.0 mm / 62.1 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7.5J x 17, 8J x 18, 8J x 19
16 in
Wheelbase
2729 mm / 107.4 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2756 mm / 108.5 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.24
0.3
Electric Range
72.0 km / 44.7 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
72.2 mm / 2.8 in
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.6:1
Engine | Stroke
81.4 mm / 3.2 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Reviews

Neofiliac score
35%
37%
13%
Pros
  • Decent performance in the AMG models
  • Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 3.6L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Clean exterior styling
Cons
  • Mass-produced "AMG" engines not true to AMG
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Lethargic transmission
  • Basic suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.