Compare Mercedes GLE Coupe C167 vs Mercedes GLC-Class X253 vs Mercedes GLA H247
Variants
AMG GLE 53
AMG GLE 63 S
AMG GLE 63
GLE 350d
GLE 350de
GLE 350e
GLE 400d
GLC 43 AMG 4MATIC AT
GLC 63 AMG 4MATIC+ MCT
GLC 63 AMG S 4MATIC+ MCT
F-CELL 4MATIC
GLC 220d 4MATIC AT
GLC 250 4MATIC AT
GLC 250d 4MATIC AT
GLC 300 4MATIC AT
GLC 350d 4MATIC AT
GLC 350e 4MATIC AT
AMG GLA 35 4MATIC
AMG GLA 45 4MATIC+
AMG GLA 45 S 4MATIC+
GLA 180
GLA 180d
GLA 200
GLA 200 4MATIC
GLA 200d
GLA 200d 4MATIC
GLA 220d
GLA 220d 4MATIC
GLA 250
GLA 250 4MATIC
GLA 250e
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
435-1430 L
Coolant Capacity
6.8 L / 7.2 qt
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
19.9 deg
18.3 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
12.1 deg
14.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
16.5 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.5 kWh (gross)
15.6 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
123 mm / 4.8 in
143 mm / 5.6 in
Size | Height
1611 mm / 63.4 in
Size | Length
4410 mm / 173.6 in
Size | Width
1834 mm / 72.2 in | 2020 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1605.0 mm / 63.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
Wheelbase
2935 mm / 115.6 in
2873 mm / 113.1 in
2729 mm / 107.4 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.35
0.33
Electric Range
51.0 km / 31.7 mi
64.0 km / 39.8 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
72.2 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.6:1
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
81.4 mm / 3.2 in
Transmission | Gears
9-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic 9G-Tronic
Double clutch transmission (DCT)
Production
Availability
2020
Made In
Germany, China, Thailand
Reviews
Neofiliac score
71%
60%
32%
Pros
- Available with the M177 V8
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Great V8 in the 63AMG models
- Cleaner exterior styling
- Low official fuel consumption
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Decent interior quality
Cons
- Hunchback crossover nonsense
- Very ugly and pompous
- Most engines are lethargic
- Fuel-cell not widely available
- Crossover nonsense
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.