Compare Audi Q3 F3 vs Honda HR-V 3 vs Honda Pilot 2
Variants
35 TDI quattro
35 TDI quattro DCT
35 TDI DCT
35 TDI Euro6d DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI Euro6d
35 TFSI Euro6d DCT
35 TFSI DCT
40 TDI quattro DCT
40 TDI Euro6d quattro DCT
40 TFSI quattro DCT
45 TFSI quattro DCT
45 TFSI e DCT
1.5 e:HEV
1.8 CVT
1.8 AWD CVT
AWD
FWD
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
79.0 L / 20.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
8
Payload
469 kg / 1034 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 330 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 333 mm
Offroad | Approach Angle
20.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
17.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
203 mm / 8.0 in
Size | Width
1994 mm / 78.5 in
Track Width | Front
1584.0 mm / 62.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
1715.0 mm / 67.5 in
Wheelbase
2680 mm / 105.5 in
2774 mm / 109.2 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
10.6 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
10.1 sec
CO2 Emission
96 g/km
Electric Range
61.0 km / 37.9 mi
Top Speed
171.0 km/h / 106.3 mph
Powertrain
Emission Standard
ULEV-2
Engine
LEC3
J35Z4
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.6:1
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 211.8 cu-in / 3471.0 cc
Engine | Power
253.0 hp / 188.7 kW @ 5700 rpm
Engine | Redline
6700 rpm
6300 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
72.9 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
93.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Torque
343 Nm / 253.0 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 SOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2021
2008 ~ 2015
Reviews
Neofiliac score
37%
22%
34%
Pros
- Decent styling
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Sportier styling
- Good engines
- Some offroad capabilities
- High cargo capacity
- High engine reliability
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Crossover nonsense
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Poor performance
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- CVT
- Quite ugly
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.