Compare Audi Q3 F3 vs Toyota C-HR (AX10/AX50) vs Toyota C-HR facelift

Audi Q3 F3

Toyota C-HR (AX10/AX50)

Toyota C-HR facelift

Audi Q3 F3Toyota C-HR (AX10/AX50)Toyota C-HR facelift
Variants
35 TDI quattro
35 TDI quattro DCT
35 TDI DCT
35 TDI Euro6d DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI Euro6d
35 TFSI Euro6d DCT
35 TFSI DCT
40 TDI quattro DCT
40 TDI Euro6d quattro DCT
40 TFSI quattro DCT
45 TFSI quattro DCT
45 TFSI e DCT
1.2
1.2 4WD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 AT
1.2
1.2 AWD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 CVT
2.0 Hybrid

Reviews

Neofiliac score37%28%42%
Pros
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Decent exterior styling
  • Low official fuel consumption (hybrid)
  • Small turning circle
  • Good engine reliability
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Just a clumsy hatchback
  • Poor performance
  • Only available with small engines
  • Impractical

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.