Compare Mercedes GLC X253 vs Renault Captur 2 vs Renault Captur

Variants
AMG GLC 43 4MATIC
AMG GLC 63 4MATIC+
AMG GLC 63 S 4MATIC+
GLC 200 4MATIC
GLC 200d 4MATIC
GLC 220d 4MATIC
GLC 300 4MATIC
GLC 300d 4MATIC
GLC 300de 4MATIC
GLC 300e 4MATIC
GLC 400d 4MATIC
1.0 TCe 100
1.0 TCe 91
1.3 TCe 130 DCT
1.3 TCe 130
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 140 AT
1.3 TCe 154 AT
1.5 dCi 115
1.5 dCi 115 AT
1.5 dCi 95
E-TECH 143
E-TECH 160
TCe 90
TCe 120 AT
TCe 120
TCe 120 AT Stop&Start
TCe 130
dCi 110
dCi 110 Euro6b
dCi 90 AT
dCi 90 Euro6b
dCi 90 Euro6b AT
dCi 90
TCe 150
TCe 150 AT

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
13.5 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Crossover

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
170 mm / 6.7 in
Size | Length
4227 mm / 166.4 in
4122 mm / 162.3 in
Track Width | Front
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
1531.0 mm / 60.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
1516.0 mm / 59.7 in
Wheelbase
2873 mm / 113.1 in
2639 mm / 103.9 in
2606 mm / 102.6 in

Performance

Electric Range
45.0 km / 28.0 mi
50.0 km / 31.1 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
76.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
15.5:1
16.0:1
Engine | Stroke
80.5 mm / 3.2 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score
72%
3%
1%
Pros
  • Good performance
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Good interior styling
  • Good towing capacity
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Crossover nonsense
  • PHEV nonsense
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Very ugly
  • Poor build quality
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Both ugly and forgettable

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.