Compare Range Rover Velar L560 facelift vs Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Peugeot 508 RXH
Variants
D200
P250
P400e
D300
P340
P400
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
2.0 BlueHDi AT
2.0 HDi Hybrid AT
2.0 HDi Hybrid AWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.5 L / 5.8 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
15.6 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
19.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Water Fording
530 mm / 20.9 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
17.1 kWh (gross)
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
184 mm / 7.2 in
Size | Height
1678 mm / 66.1 in
1649 mm / 64.9 in
Size | Length
4797 mm / 188.9 in
4371 mm / 172.1 in
Size | Width
2147 mm / 84.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 2041 mm / 80.4 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1640.0 mm / 64.6 in
1592.0 mm / 62.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1657.0 mm / 65.2 in
1564.0 mm / 61.6 in
Wheelbase
2874 mm / 113.1 in
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2815 mm / 110.8 in
Performance
Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
5.0 km / 3.1 mi
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1100 kg / 2425 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Engine
DW10CTED4
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
85.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1997.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
88.0 mm / 3.5 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
67%
27%
25%
Pros
- Some interesting engine options
- More reliable than the bigger RRs
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Not very ugly
Cons
- Crossover nonsense
- Very ugly
- FWD-based
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Uglier than the standard 508 SW
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.