HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Range Rover Velar L560 facelift vs Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Mini Countryman F60 LCI

Variants
D200
P250
P400e
D300
P340
P400
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
Cooper
Cooper ALL4 AT
Cooper AT
Cooper D 1.5
Cooper D 1.5 AT
Cooper D 2.0
Cooper D 2.0 ALL4 AT
Cooper D 2.0 AT
Cooper S
Cooper S ALL4 AT
Cooper S AT
Cooper SD ALL4 AT
Cooper SD AT
Cooper SE ALL4 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Disc
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Water Fording
530 mm / 20.9 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
17.1 kWh (gross)
10.0 kWh (gross)

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Height
1678 mm / 66.1 in
1649 mm / 64.9 in
Size | Length
4797 mm / 188.9 in
4371 mm / 172.1 in
4297 mm / 169.2 in
Size | Width
2147 mm / 84.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 2041 mm / 80.4 in (mirror folded)
1822 mm / 71.7 in | 2001 mm / 78.8 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1640.0 mm / 64.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1657.0 mm / 65.2 in
Wheelbase
2874 mm / 113.1 in
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in

Performance

Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
68.0 km / 42.3 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2020
2020
Debut
2017
Facelift
2020-05-27
Made In
Netherlands, India, Indonesia, Malaysia

Reviews

Neofiliac score
67%
27%
32%
Pros
  • Some interesting engine options
  • More reliable than the bigger RRs
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent handling
Cons
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Very ugly
  • FWD-based
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Poor performance
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible styling
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Limited utility

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.