Compare Range Rover Velar L560 facelift vs Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Toyota Yaris Cross
Variants
D200
P250
P400e
D300
P340
P400
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
1.5
1.5 4WD
1.5 Hybrid
1.5 Hybrid E-Four
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs
275 kg / 606 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Disc
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
215/50 R18
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Water Fording
530 mm / 20.9 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
17.1 kWh (gross)
Platform
TNGA: GA-B
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
170 mm / 6.7 in
Size | Height
1678 mm / 66.1 in
1649 mm / 64.9 in
1590 mm / 62.6 in
Size | Length
4797 mm / 188.9 in
4371 mm / 172.1 in
4180 mm / 164.6 in
Size | Width
2147 mm / 84.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 2041 mm / 80.4 in (mirror folded)
1765 mm / 69.5 in
Track Width | Front
1640.0 mm / 64.6 in
1515.0 mm / 59.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1657.0 mm / 65.2 in
Wheel Size
18 in
Wheelbase
2874 mm / 113.1 in
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2560 mm / 100.8 in
Performance
Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
1.5 L / 90.9 cu-in / 1490.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
97.6 mm / 3.8 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2020
2020
Debut
2020-04-23
Made In
Japan, France
Reviews
Neofiliac score
67%
27%
9%
Pros
- Some interesting engine options
- More reliable than the bigger RRs
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Low fuel consumption
- Good reliability
Cons
- Crossover nonsense
- Very ugly
- FWD-based
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- Basic equipment
- No independent rear suspensions
- Poor handling
- Bland
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.