Compare Range Rover Velar L560 facelift vs Ford Explorer 6 vs Ford Flex
Variants
D200
P250
P400e
D300
P340
P400
2.3 EcoBoost 300
2.3 EcoBoost 300 AWD
3.0 EcoBoost 457 PHEV AWD
3.3 Cyclone 322 Hybrid
3.0 EcoBoost 365 AWD
ST 3.0 EcoBoost 400 AWD
3.5 262
3.5 262 AWD
3.5 286
3.5 286 AWD
3.5 355 AWD
3.5 364 AWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
566 L / 20.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
71.0 L / 18.8 gal
Passengers
5
Payload
769 kg / 1695 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.6 m / 41.3 ft
Water Fording
530 mm / 20.9 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
17.1 kWh (gross)
13.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
150 mm / 5.9 in
Size | Height
1678 mm / 66.1 in
1727 mm / 68.0 in
Size | Length
4797 mm / 188.9 in
5130 mm / 202.0 in
Size | Width
2147 mm / 84.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 2041 mm / 80.4 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1640.0 mm / 64.6 in
1699.0 mm / 66.9 in
1661.0 mm / 65.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1657.0 mm / 65.2 in
1699.0 mm / 66.9 in
1661.0 mm / 65.4 in
Weight
2105.0 kg / 4640.7 lbs
Wheelbase
2874 mm / 113.1 in
3025 mm / 119.1 in
2995 mm / 117.9 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
6.0 sec
8.8 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
5.7 sec
8.4 sec
CO2 Emission
66 g/km
Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
Fuel Economy
2.9 L/100km / 81.1 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
230.0 km/h / 142.9 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP-EVAP-ISC
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
92.5 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.3 cu-in / 3496.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
86.7 mm / 3.4 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
10-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
2020
2019
Reviews
Neofiliac score
67%
69%
81%
Pros
- Some interesting engine options
- More reliable than the bigger RRs
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Athletic styling
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Superb exterior design
- Great interior finish
- Lots of room inside
- Decent drivetrain reliability
Cons
- Crossover nonsense
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Crossover nonsense
- Does not perform well
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.