HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Range Rover Velar L560 facelift vs Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Audi Q3 F3

Variants
D200
P250
P400e
D300
P340
P400
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
35 TDI quattro
35 TDI quattro DCT
35 TDI DCT
35 TDI Euro6d DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI Euro6d
35 TFSI Euro6d DCT
35 TFSI DCT
40 TDI quattro DCT
40 TDI Euro6d quattro DCT
40 TFSI quattro DCT
45 TFSI quattro DCT
45 TFSI e DCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Offroad | Approach Angle
20.4 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
17.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Water Fording
530 mm / 20.9 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
17.1 kWh (gross)
13.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Height
1678 mm / 66.1 in
1649 mm / 64.9 in
Size | Length
4797 mm / 188.9 in
4371 mm / 172.1 in
Size | Width
2147 mm / 84.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 2041 mm / 80.4 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1640.0 mm / 64.6 in
1584.0 mm / 62.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1657.0 mm / 65.2 in
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
Wheelbase
2874 mm / 113.1 in
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2680 mm / 105.5 in

Performance

Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
61.0 km / 37.9 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
67%
27%
37%
Pros
  • Some interesting engine options
  • More reliable than the bigger RRs
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Very ugly
  • FWD-based
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.